NYPD moves to evict Occupy Wall Street
Nov. 15th, 2011 01:45 amLate Monday night/Tuesday morning, the NYPD told Occupy Wall Street protestors to get out and shortly afterwards began moving to forcibly evict or arrest the protestors. (Coverage by NY Times and Mother Jones) There are reports of pepper spray and use of excessive force. (Video here of police arresting people. Lots of shouting and screaming, shoving, batons out.) The protestors' stuff, including a library of 5,000 donated books, is being thrown away. Really, NYPD? Destroying books? This is not what democracy looks like.
If they're trying to quell the protests, late night raids with rough tactics aren't the way to do it. Not only is it against the spirit of our democracy, it's dumb tactics. Left to the cold of the New York winter, it's quite possible that people would have gone home and let the movement fade to old news. But sometimes protests can be like Obi Wan Kenobi: strike them down, and they become more powerful than you can possibly imagine. I hope that's the case with this one (so long as we stay nonviolent).
Like any protest movement, this one has some flaws, but I think it's important. OWS has changed the national conversation to be more about fixing inequality, not just the Tea Party's pet issue of reducing government spending that had been dominating the news. It expresses the need for deep change that helped push progressives and many other Americans to vote for Obama, but which he has largely failed to implement. Its internal processes are a worthy experiment in direct democracy (if not efficiency). It sets the true lives of the people against the falsity of corporate personhood. It's the voice in the urban wilderness speaking out on behalf of the 99%.
If they're trying to quell the protests, late night raids with rough tactics aren't the way to do it. Not only is it against the spirit of our democracy, it's dumb tactics. Left to the cold of the New York winter, it's quite possible that people would have gone home and let the movement fade to old news. But sometimes protests can be like Obi Wan Kenobi: strike them down, and they become more powerful than you can possibly imagine. I hope that's the case with this one (so long as we stay nonviolent).
Like any protest movement, this one has some flaws, but I think it's important. OWS has changed the national conversation to be more about fixing inequality, not just the Tea Party's pet issue of reducing government spending that had been dominating the news. It expresses the need for deep change that helped push progressives and many other Americans to vote for Obama, but which he has largely failed to implement. Its internal processes are a worthy experiment in direct democracy (if not efficiency). It sets the true lives of the people against the falsity of corporate personhood. It's the voice in the urban wilderness speaking out on behalf of the 99%.