ext_155409 ([identity profile] candrabindu.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] tardis_stowaway 2010-06-30 04:17 am (UTC)

The duck pond without ducks: should we assume the ducks were sucked into a crack? Or will this be explained more next season to?

Was this mentioned after TEH and I missed it, or have you been wondering about it all this time? I had pretty much assumed the duck pond thing was just a random philosophical question with no particular plot significance, although it would certainly be interesting if it came up again. Incidentally, I can totally imagine a bunch of psycholinguists writing papers about why it's called a duck pond when there are no ducks in it.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting